Posts Tagged ‘paramedic intubation’

The death of pre-hospital intubation

No way Sean! Say it aint so!

Unfortunately this could be a reality in the near future. In California, there is a large push to pull intubation from the scope of paramedics. In L.A. County, they already removed pediatric intubation. Many of the “higher-ups” are starting to think that the skill is unnecessary in a pre-hospital setting.  Some actually believe that intubation is too risky to be performed by paramedics. Scary thought huh?

This all sparked from a couple EMS systems (I wont mention names) that have a big problem with intubation. Success rates averaging around 60% in these areas having raised quite a few eyebrows. Unfortunately these areas make up a large portion of the state. While it is clear that some areas have a problem, I think that this is the wrong way to go about fixing it.

This trend of “dumbing down” EMS really troubles me. I can’t think of any other profession that takes away responsibilities at the first sign of incompetence. I wouldn’t want cops to have their guns taken away for having a bad day at the range. I would expect that the areas of deficiency be addressed by training, refresher courses, skills labs, etc.

Intubation is an extremely valuable procedure that we do. I mean sure, secondary airways like Combitubes or King Airways WORK but they are counter productive when the receiving ER doc pulls them immediately upon arrival to place an ET tube. It is not a difficult skill and there is absolutely no reason why we can’t be proficient at it.

I know that a lot of this is just talk right now, but it scares me to think that our leaders are even considering it. I want to see EMS continue to move forward and advance. This is certainly not the way to do it.

Ever seen one of these?

image

A 10.0 ET tube…….ever seen one?

Intubation – A high or low priority?

IntubationCurrent2_tcm16-210658A common theme around hospitals and the latest ACLS guidelines suggest that intubation should no longer be considered a high priority. Instead it is now recommended that high-quality CPR and early defibrillation take priority over all other ALS interventions. I for one feel differently when it comes to pre-hospital care.

According to the American Heart Association, other procedures like IV access and medication adminstration can be performed before intubation if adequate ventillations are taking place by means of a bag-valve-mask. While I certainly agree with the concept, I do not feel that it is very practical for situations when EMS is involved. Unlike hospital settings, EMS workers have to deal with bumpy roads, tight corners, environmental factors and limited room in most ambulances. It can be extremely difficult to maintain a good seal and adequately ventilate a patient in those conditions.

Early intubation frees up hands, limits the amount of time suction is needed and allows paramedics to focus on interventions like chest compressions, defibrillation and medication adminstration.

I am not saying that I completely dissagree with the new ACLS guidelines. I simply feel that pre-hospital care was not taken into consideration when they were released. I would be interested to see how much of the Heart Association’s research was done on pre-hospital cases.

As always, feel free to e-mail me with any questions or comments.

Designed by: Business Web Hosting | Thanks to Buy Icons, travel tips and Used Cars